Gammon Forum
Notice: Any messages purporting to come from this site telling you that your password has expired, or that you need to "verify" your details, making threats, or asking for money, are
spam. We do not email users with any such messages. If you have lost your password you can obtain a new one by using the
password reset link.
Entire forum
MUSHclient
General
Bulletin board traffic / registering
Bulletin board traffic / registering
|
It is now over 60 days since the last post. This thread is closed.
  Refresh page
Posted by
| Unregistered user
(72 posts) bio
|
Date
| Mon 14 Aug 2000 (UTC) |
Message
| *pindrop*
Quiet in here.
Well, since I'm here, might as well voice a nontechnical curiosity;
About what *is* the userbase of MUSHClient anyway? And the registration rate of that? Percentage ratio of registered-to-unregistered users?
Anywho, it's not really critical that I know this as it's really none of my business, but at least it's a question relating to MUSHClient.
-KuraiFox | top |
|
Posted by
| Nick Gammon
Australia (23,042 posts) bio
Forum Administrator |
Date
| Reply #1 on Mon 14 Aug 2000 02:06 AM (UTC) |
Message
| It *is* quiet isn't it.
Until recently only the beta-testers have known about this forum. I'm hoping that it will become more popular (and therefore more useful) when it becomes better known.
There are over 700 registered MUSHclient users, with new ones registering at the rate of around one per day.
As for the unregistered ones that is impossible to know, of course, but as a guess, based on the rate of downloads to registrations, that between 1% and 10% of users register the program.
For example, I recently spoke to someone here in Melbourne, Australia, who said that "all my friends, and I, use MUSHclient". He admitted that none of them had registered it. I have only had about 8 registrations from this part of the world over the last 5 years.
|
- Nick Gammon
www.gammon.com.au, www.mushclient.com | top |
|
Posted by
| Unregistered user
(72 posts) bio
|
Date
| Reply #2 on Tue 17 Oct 2000 (UTC) |
Message
| I think it's perhaps a testiment to the shareware business model as a whole. I know the initial start-up delay was THE most annoying... perhaps irritation is the reason people register it, but then again you may get more registered without said delay. I've never sold software in this way myself, so I cannot honestly guarantee anything regarding this suggestion.
If ASP allows it (it's been several years since I've reviewed their policies), you could research radiate.com. It is an advertisement-serving site that you can plug into programs, new and current. Though this may be more irritating to some than the delay it would ensure you get at least a moderate amount of revenue from even unregistered versions; like GetRight, a purchase-version would be ad-free.
I've personally downloaded the SDK and it's very easy to integrate even into existing projects, as it's simply a couple DLL calls. MUSHClient uses space wisely and internet users are already choked with ads anyway, but if registration rate is really a problem, experimenting with other or similar business models might do you well.
Regards,
-KuraiFox | top |
|
Posted by
| Nick Gammon
Australia (23,042 posts) bio
Forum Administrator |
Date
| Reply #3 on Tue 17 Oct 2000 03:55 PM (UTC) |
Message
| I gather you are talking about some kind of banner ads for unregistered copies.
It's a nice idea, but I find ads so annoying in general that I won't do that. We seem to be surrounded by them - painted on football ovals, plastered on the sides of stadiums, worn by sportspeople, incessantly on TV (even on pay TV in Australia).
As far as I am concerned one more ad is one more too many.
As for the initial delay for unregistered copies, I know it is annoying, and I know that some people will be so annoyed they won't register, on principle.
However, having said that, a while ago I had a couple of ShareWare products that had no initial delay, but just "asked nicely" for the registration fee. How many registrations did I get from them? About one or two a year.
You can't please everyone all the time, but the (fairly short) registration delay for unregistered copies seems to be a fairly good compromise. You can always leave the copy running for days - it shouldn't crash. For instance, I have a connection running right now that has been up for 6 days. |
- Nick Gammon
www.gammon.com.au, www.mushclient.com | top |
|
Posted by
| Unregistered user
(72 posts) bio
|
Date
| Reply #4 on Fri 20 Oct 2000 (UTC) |
Message
| I understand.
I registered it because I finally had the money to, and I believe it's a bit of software worth registering, considering I started at version 2.13... even when I knew work-arounds to the initial delay. Yeah, it took me that long to get $20USD. Sad, ain't it?
- KuraiFox | top |
|
Posted by
| Unregistered user
(72 posts) bio
|
Date
| Reply #5 on Tue 24 Oct 2000 (UTC) |
Message
| I tried what must have been a truckload of MU** clients before finally coming across MUSHClient when it was in its initial stages. At the time it was easily one of the better programs to use out there... and once the 2.00 series came out, I definitely had to register. I use the program whenever my computer is running... I think heavy usage like that is worthy of some cash. And just as a side note: I've never, ever, had a version of MUSHClient crash on my in any way... nice track record.
- Kaeru | top |
|
Posted by
| Nick Gammon
Australia (23,042 posts) bio
Forum Administrator |
Date
| Reply #6 on Thu 26 Oct 2000 (UTC) |
Message
| Glad it has been so reliable. :)
As a matter of fact *I* tried quite a few MUD clients before I started *writing* MUSHclient.
Although some of them have improved recently, a few years ago I found that most of them were too slow, hard to use, and in some cases crashed quite often.
Hence, MUSHclient was born, which has turned into a bigger project than I initially expected.
|
- Nick Gammon
www.gammon.com.au, www.mushclient.com | top |
|
Posted by
| Unregistered user
(72 posts) bio
|
Date
| Reply #7 on Wed 08 Nov 2000 (UTC) |
Message
| I don't know if other people share my concern, but part of the reason that I have not registered Mushclient is the way that you have to pay for it. IMHO, you should look into having some kind of online company deal with your credit card orders. There are several such companies that will handle your customers. That is how I paid for Zmud, and it was very easy and appeared much more secure and professional than the way that Mushclient registration works. DigiBuy, Kagi, and ShareIt all seem to be companies that participate in this sort of activity.
- bleys2002 | top |
|
Posted by
| Unregistered user
(72 posts) bio
|
Date
| Reply #8 on Fri 10 Nov 2000 (UTC) |
Message
| Well, the title says it all, more or less. ;)
PayPal has now (since about a week back or so) started taking international orders, and apparently a lot of people have been using them with quite good results. Perhaps that's a reasonable option?
I do admit I was slightly worried when I used my credit card to purchase MUSHclient on-line, since its hard to get a good grasp of which payment methods are safe and which aren't. All went well, though. :)
- Linda | top |
|
Posted by
| Nick Gammon
Australia (23,042 posts) bio
Forum Administrator |
Date
| Reply #9 on Fri 10 Nov 2000 02:53 AM (UTC) |
Message
| I agree with the comments above - the registration process is somewhat cumbersome.
I am actively investigating moving to an online registration system, where you can pay via credit card using a secure server, and receive your registration number immediately (well, within a couple of minutes).
I also plan an automated system for emailing lost/forgotten registration codes to users who supply their name and email address. This will make it easier for users whose hard disks crash, or have other problems.
There are also plans afoot for more "dynamic" web page content, where you can search for bugs/FAQs with a query page.
Check out the MUSHclient web pages over the next few weeks, and you should see some of these enhancements in action.
|
- Nick Gammon
www.gammon.com.au, www.mushclient.com | top |
|
Posted by
| Nick Gammon
Australia (23,042 posts) bio
Forum Administrator |
Date
| Reply #10 on Mon 29 Jan 2001 (UTC) |
Message
| |
The dates and times for posts above are shown in Universal Co-ordinated Time (UTC).
To show them in your local time you can join the forum, and then set the 'time correction' field in your profile to the number of hours difference between your location and UTC time.
27,545 views.
It is now over 60 days since the last post. This thread is closed.
  Refresh page
top
Quick links:
MUSHclient.
MUSHclient help.
Forum shortcuts.
Posting templates.
Lua modules.
Lua documentation.
Information and images on this site are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License unless stated otherwise.