Quote: There is also the problem of signed vs. unsigned characters but that shouldn't make a huge difference.
Why would there be a problem? Is the OP trying to play with raw data?
Quote: I would assume, though, that most MUD clients would know how to handle this stuff
Windows-based clients may inherently be able to, but I wouldn't rely on such an assumption.
Quote: I don't think MUD clients make assumptions about 7-bit characters.
No. I don't think many MUDs realize the old requirement about it. In this day and age, it is rather obsolete. However, all telnet applications must do 7-bit ASCII transfer until a request is made to do otherwise.
Back to the OP:
Quote: I read some posts how to type it so the MUD can handle it, but not displayed via the code.
After going over the RFCs again, this might help you:
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc698.html
It allows safe negotiation with clients and servers about using extendend ASCII. I'm not sure of how many clients implement it, however. |