Notice: Any messages purporting to come from this site telling you that your password has expired, or that you need to verify your details, confirm your email, resolve issues, making threats, or asking for money, are
spam. We do not email users with any such messages. If you have lost your password you can obtain a new one by using the
password reset link.
Due to spam on this forum, all posts now need moderator approval.
Entire forum
➜ MUSHclient
➜ Suggestions
➜ Background Image?
It is now over 60 days since the last post. This thread is closed.
Refresh page
Posted by
| Irinami
(4 posts) Bio
|
Date
| Fri 09 Nov 2001 04:29 AM (UTC) |
Message
| Hey Nick, hey fans, this is a quick vote of support for Suggestion... 086 I think; the suggestion for inserting a background image.
I love MUSHclient, I love how it's not bloated, but to tell the truth the only background colours I can conjure up that aren't depressing just end up clashing with a reasonable ANSI pallette. ^^;
I just downloaded SimpleMU, and I'm seeing if it can compete. So far it looks like it's for a slightly more laypersonish crowd... but... it has the background image! *.* Maybe I'll keep MUSHclient for Staffly duties and coding, and SM for playing... oro... ;) | Top |
|
Posted by
| Torgny
Sweden (15 posts) Bio
|
Date
| Reply #1 on Fri 23 Nov 2001 01:42 PM (UTC) |
Message
| It is features like background images that make a client bloated, and I for one, prefer plain ANSI grey on black with standard colors. That is what makes MUSHClient so fast and reliable, no pointless cosmetics. |
"Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines!" | Top |
|
Posted by
| Linda
Sweden (164 posts) Bio
|
Date
| Reply #2 on Fri 23 Nov 2001 11:59 PM (UTC) |
Message
| As long as its optional, and doesn't complicate matters for those who don't want to use it, I suppose it doesn't hurt. Although, since I have experienced a much higher number of unexplainable crashes after the pueblo/mxp features were added, I suppose it doesn't hurt to be wary of new features.
However, I have to admit that after using Netscape 6.2 for a while, I have kind of taken a liking to sleek, elegant themes. It really can make an application much more visually appealing, and that does count for something. | Top |
|
Posted by
| Torgny
Sweden (15 posts) Bio
|
Date
| Reply #3 on Fri 31 May 2002 07:56 AM (UTC) |
Message
| In the case of the latter Netscape versions I would say that features and application crashes go hand in hand. No, I am not trying to start a browser war, I just think that Netscape was a bad example of a sleek application that works fine. ;) Sort of like Windows XP. *cackles madly and watches the thread fill with IE/Opera/Lynx/Netscape and Linux/XP/Mac flames and feels pity for the person that will have to moderate the post later* |
"Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines!" | Top |
|
Posted by
| Nick Gammon
Australia (23,140 posts) Bio
Forum Administrator |
Date
| Reply #4 on Fri 31 May 2002 10:07 PM (UTC) |
Message
| I still like the definition:
Upgrade: Replace your old bugs with new ones.
|
- Nick Gammon
www.gammon.com.au, www.mushclient.com | Top |
|
The dates and times for posts above are shown in Universal Co-ordinated Time (UTC).
To show them in your local time you can join the forum, and then set the 'time correction' field in your profile to the number of hours difference between your location and UTC time.
17,665 views.
It is now over 60 days since the last post. This thread is closed.
Refresh page
top